Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.), a member of the select panel on the Capitol attack by Trump supporters. “We’ve spoken a lot about accountability,” said Rep. 6 select committee is still pursuing wide-ranging inquiries into Trump’s conduct and preparing to reveal reams of evidence to federal prosecutors as well. Federal prosecutors revealed on July 27 they had obtained a new search warrant to access the phone of one of those allies, attorney John Eastman. The Justice Department is seeking information about a host of well-known allies in Trump’s effort to disrupt the transfer of power and claim a second term he didn’t win. To add even more to the list of probes edging closer to the former president, he is also under an Atlanta-area grand jury investigation by a local prosecutor. Horowitz, the Justice Department’s inspector general, and pledged to cooperate with his investigation, according to a person briefed on those talks.While at least two former top White House officials have appeared before a grand jury recently, it’s not yet clear whether Trump is, or will become, the target of a federal criminal probe. He also reached out directly to Michael E. Rosen quickly scheduled interviews with Congressional investigators to get as much of his version of events on the record before any players could ask the courts to block the proceedings, according to two people familiar with those discussions who are not authorized to speak about ongoing investigations. Collins said he might take some undisclosed legal action if congressional investigators sought “privileged information.” Trump, said last week that the former president would not seek to bar former Justice Department officials from speaking with investigators. Rosen has spent much of the year in discussions with the Justice Department over what information he could provide to investigators, given that decision-making conversations between administration officials are usually kept confidential.ĭouglas A. In that case, the inspector general could refer the matter to federal prosecutors. Clark crossed the line into potentially criminal behavior. The Justice Department’s inspector general could make a determination about whether Mr. Clark’s actions emerge, it is unclear what, if any, consequences he could face. ![]() Donoghue, rejected the proposal.Īs details of Mr. Clark’s colleagues to prevent the White House from overturning the election results, and Mr. Such a letter would effectively undermine efforts by Mr. Rosen, but the plot highlights the former president’s desire to batter the Justice Department into advancing his personal agenda. Clark at the top of the department to carry out that plan. The investigations were opened following a New York Times article that detailed efforts by Jeffrey Clark, the acting head of the Justice Department’s civil division, to push top leaders to falsely and publicly assert that ongoing election fraud investigations cast doubt on the Electoral College results. Rosen had a meeting on Friday with the Justice Department’s office of the inspector general and provided closed-door testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Saturday. Trump subvert the results of the 2020 election, according to a person familiar with the interviews. ![]() Rosen, who was acting attorney general during the Trump administration, has told the Justice Department watchdog and Congressional investigators that one of his deputies tried to help former President Donald J.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |